Thursday, March 27, 2008

Hymn to her, God save us from people who have our best interests at heart


Its an opinion piece.

Internet addiction appears to be a common disorder that merits inclusion in DSM-V.
J. J. Block writes in the American Journal of Psychiatry (March, 2008): Conceptually, the diagnosis is a compulsive-impulsive spectrum disorder that involves online and/or offline computer usage (1, 2) and consists of at least three subtypes: ex-cessive gaming, sexual preoccupations, and e-mail/text messaging (3). All of the var-iants share the following four components: 1) excessive use, often associated with a loss of sense of time or a neglect of basic drives, 2) withdrawal, including feelings of anger, tension, and/or depression when the computer is inaccessible, 3) tolerance, including the need for better computer equipment, more software, or more hours of use, and 4) negative repercussions, including arguments, lying, poor achievement, social isolation,
and fatigue.

The contributers to DSM are just people too (seems often a conservative group with past inclusions including sexual orientation as a mental illness.)
What surprizes me though is the ignorance brought to these deliberations.
In a comparative analysis of landlines with mobiles, the literature reviewed by Amparo Lasen shows "... civilisation advances new kinds of diseases produced by novel agencies brought to bear on man’s body and mind” as reported by the British Medical Journal in 1889. The fear of health risks derived from telephone use also arose in the
early days of its development. Even “strong-minded and able-bodied men” were considered to be susceptible because of the “almost constant strain of the auditory apparatus” in people who uses the telephone very often. The symptoms were nervous excitability, buzzing in the ear, giddiness and neuralgic pains. A certain amount of "moral panic" often follows the introduction of many new technologies. Some of the risks considered are the same in both landline and mobile phones; others are different, following the more feared diseases of each period."
Seems phones have been contributing to our madness ever since their inception.
The fears of inconsiderate behaviour, neglect of 'actual relationships' and social hysteria are not new.
Somethings change, some stay the same.
What truly surprizes me is that it gets published and reported.
Again.

AND SHE WILL ALWAYS CARRY ON
SOMETHING IS LOST
BUT SOMETHING IS FOUND
THEY WILL KEEP ON SPEAKING HER NAME
SOME THINGS CHANGE
SOME STAY THE SAME

Hymn To Her

5 comments:

  1. Have you read Caroline Marvin's When Old Technologies Were New: Thinking About Communication in the Late Nineteenth Century (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988; paperback, 1990)? - is packed tightly with the most delicious anecdotal records to advance and extend your arguments here - I'd include some but my copy is hiding and despite scanning the shelves I cannot spot it this morning

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for the reminder, there is so much to read and as always, it feels like so little time. But have just asked my library to access it for me. The first few pages on amazon provided a taster of textual literacies where those who do the writing attempt to establish the authority.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'd lend you mine if I had the ability to locate it amongst the books in the library - I thought Library Thing might help me - but all it has done is make the situation worse by alerting me to other books I have lost and must repurchase or other books I must read (and being a boundary worker who lives without easy access to academic libraries this equates to another Alibris or Amazon purchase)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks Arti you are very generous, there are advantages to being in academia and access to multiple libraries is one of them. Let me know if I ever might reciprocate the offer :)

    ReplyDelete